![]() ![]() better-sqlite3 is much faster than node-sqlite3 in most cases, and just as fast in all other cases.better-sqlite3 is simpler to use, and it provides nice utilities for some operations that are very difficult or impossible in node-sqlite3.better-sqlite3 does it the JavaScript way, allowing the garbage collector to worry about memory management. node-sqlite3 exposes low-level (C language) memory management functions.It also causes mutex thrashing which has devastating effects on performance. That's not only bad design, but it wastes tons of resources. ![]() node-sqlite3 uses asynchronous APIs for tasks that are either CPU-bound or serialized.Why should I use this instead of node-sqlite3? Usage const db = require( 'better-sqlite3')( 'foobar.db', options) Ĭonst row = db.prepare( 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?').get(userId) Ĭonsole.log(row.firstName, row.lastName, row.email) If you have trouble installing, check the troubleshooting guide. Prebuilt binaries are available for LTS versions. You must be using Node.js v10.20.1 or above. You can verify these results by running the benchmark yourself. If your company uses better-sqlite3, ask your manager to consider supporting the project: Long nights and weekends were spent keeping this project strong and dependable, with no ask for compensation or funding, until now. Worker thread support (for large/slow queries)īetter-sqlite3 is used by thousands of developers and engineers on a daily basis.64-bit integers (invisible until you need them).Support for user-defined functions, aggregates, virtual tables, and extensions.Easy-to-use synchronous API (better concurrency than an asynchronous API.High performance, efficiency, and safety.The fastest and simplest library for SQLite3 in Node.js. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |